Carbon 14 dating fossils Free sexy voice chatting room
Just move along." If anything, this type of behavior strongly suggests that something really is going on! Photo: Triceratops skeleton at Los Angeles Museum of Natural History. (CC-BY-SA 3.0) As a leading research professor, John Sanford has seen the harmful effects of how a faulty worldview inhibits good science, especially in the area of alleged “junk DNA”.And in this case, it's proof positive that dinosaurs are thousands and not millions of years old! In this fascinating DVD, he shows how these fallacious...Nice try, but if this were true, how could it be said that any radiocarbon dating results are accurate?
A 1990 experiment that involved radiocarbon dating of pieces from two dinosaur bones—that test will not be covered, for it involved a controversy regarding a report of shellac that may have contaminated one of the two sample sources.The proclamation that shellac had contaminated dinosaur remains from the Carnegie Museum of Natural History is irrelevant to the many tests on dinosaur bones since 1990.Let’s consider more promising testing that has taken place in more recent years.But that approach to a new discovery is far from what I would call an act of science.Comment on a Theologyweb Forum Carbon-14 dating can only extend back to roughly 50,000 years.